We seek your feedback on WWW2008 and your suggestions for WWW2009.

WIN A WWW2009 FREE REGISTRATION (*)

2) Name the 2 or 3 key reasons that motivated you to attend the WWW2008 conference?
reputation of conference series
content of this year conference
opportunity to network
back-to-back work opportunity
back-to-back tourist opportunity
location
funding was readily available
Other (please explain)

Pre Conference Organization Web Site

3a) Rate the Web site in terms of the content it provided:  
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 Excellent  
3b) What additional information would you like to have seen included?

4a) Rate the Web site in terms of design and navigation:
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 Excellent
4b) How could the Web site design have been improved

5a) Rate the www2008-list postings in terms of timing and content:
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 Excellent
5b) How could these have been improved?

6a) How straightforward was the registration process?: 
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 Excellent
6b) How could the registration process be improved?

7a) Rate the quality (value for money) of the accommodation you selected:
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 Excellent
7b) If you had any problems with accommodation please outline

At the Conference

8a) Rate the on-site registration process:
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 Excellent
8b) How could this process have been improved?

9a) Rate the overall conference facilities:
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 Excellent
9b) How could these have been improved?

10a) Rate the meals and conference dinner:
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 Excellent
10b) How could these have been improved?

11a) Which track do you think is most interesting or useful to you?
W3C AC Meeting W4A Conference Tutorials Workshops Refereed Paper
Keynotes Industrial Talks Posters Developers Track W3C Track



11b) Do you have comments or suggestions related to the contents or presentations carried out in any session of the above tracks?



11c) New track (if any) that you hope to see in WWW2009?

12) Did you visit any of the exhibits?:   Yes No   

Post Conference

14a) How would you describe your overall conference experience?
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 Excellent
14b). If your rating was poor what were the main reasons for this rating?

15) Was the conference good value for money? (in terms of professional development for time spent)
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 Excellent

16). Would you recommend the conference series to a colleague?  yes no

17a). Do you feel you will try to attend next year conference in Madrid? 
yes maybe no

17b).  If you answered "no" or "maybe" what additional factors or issues might change your mind

17c). Can you suggest any ways to make the WWW2009 Madrid conference more attractive?

17d). Can you suggest any new ways the conference might be advertised?

Demographic details

21) How many WWW series conference have you attended (including this one)?
  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 or more

22). What was your status at this year conference?
Attendee Speaker Student Poster presenter
Commitee Member Exhibitor Media

23) What sector are you currently working in?
Industry research Academic research Web developers
Web users: Government Teaching Marketing Business
Media Health Others, please specity

Thank you for taking the time to give us your comments. If you would like to be included in the lucky draw to be held by June 15th, please include your name and email. These details will be separated from your question responses upon receipt. All response will be treated as strictly confidential.

Name

e-mail

We hope to see you in Madrid at WWW2009.